<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Climate Denial Crock of the Week</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/climate-denial-crock-of-the-week/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greenfyre.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>"My heart is moved by all I cannot save"</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 07:25:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: the pirate bay.apk wiki</title>
		<link>http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/climate-denial-crock-of-the-week/#comment-31213</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[the pirate bay.apk wiki]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 04:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/?page_id=3083#comment-31213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hope these tips have given you some useful information on roofs.

--LINK REMOVED --&gt;Grammy Nominations 2011&lt;. Good fishing would have been to be been on this river all of the year-round, even in flood-time, and when the river was clear fish might be seen taking the bait in a depth of 10 feet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope these tips have given you some useful information on roofs.</p>
<p>&#8211;LINK REMOVED &#8211;&gt;Grammy Nominations 2011&lt;. Good fishing would have been to be been on this river all of the year-round, even in flood-time, and when the river was clear fish might be seen taking the bait in a depth of 10 feet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bertha</title>
		<link>http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/climate-denial-crock-of-the-week/#comment-29321</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bertha]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 01:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/?page_id=3083#comment-29321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Carol Burnett Show, CBS, 1967-78. Just as the previous 
entry has emerged because brightest star inside the excellent CBS Monday lineup,
&quot;30 Rock&quot; has been the star of NBC&#039;s Thursday night in the beginning. Jillita Horton Killed a Who.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Carol Burnett Show, CBS, 1967-78. Just as the previous<br />
entry has emerged because brightest star inside the excellent CBS Monday lineup,<br />
&#8220;30 Rock&#8221; has been the star of NBC&#8217;s Thursday night in the beginning. Jillita Horton Killed a Who.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Climate Change Tipping Points, Human and Geophysical: Which Will Come First?</title>
		<link>http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/climate-denial-crock-of-the-week/#comment-28741</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Climate Change Tipping Points, Human and Geophysical: Which Will Come First?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 10:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/?page_id=3083#comment-28741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] course, there are still many pages of denial still being pumped out every day, but the wave of awakening now seems to be breaking at a point  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] course, there are still many pages of denial still being pumped out every day, but the wave of awakening now seems to be breaking at a point  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Senior Research Project on Global Warming - Page 6 - TheEnvironmentSite.org Forum</title>
		<link>http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/climate-denial-crock-of-the-week/#comment-21760</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[My Senior Research Project on Global Warming - Page 6 - TheEnvironmentSite.org Forum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/?page_id=3083#comment-21760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marco</title>
		<link>http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/climate-denial-crock-of-the-week/#comment-11987</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 16:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/?page_id=3083#comment-11987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Colin, also note the claim by the author that Hansen announced October 2008 as the warmest on record. Ask the author to provide evidence that Hansen made this announcement. Apart from references to some denier-blogs, claiming Hansen did so, he will have no evidence. GISTEMP does not make announcements on specific months.

Or note how he claims the Colorado people are &quot;Nasa scientists&quot;, because NASA is one of the funding providers for the study.

And he also likes to quote other falsified material on temperatures in the arctic. http://www.skepticalscience.com/news.php?n=412&amp;p=2&amp;t=140]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colin, also note the claim by the author that Hansen announced October 2008 as the warmest on record. Ask the author to provide evidence that Hansen made this announcement. Apart from references to some denier-blogs, claiming Hansen did so, he will have no evidence. GISTEMP does not make announcements on specific months.</p>
<p>Or note how he claims the Colorado people are &#8220;Nasa scientists&#8221;, because NASA is one of the funding providers for the study.</p>
<p>And he also likes to quote other falsified material on temperatures in the arctic. <a href="http://www.skepticalscience.com/news.php?n=412&#038;p=2&#038;t=140" rel="nofollow">http://www.skepticalscience.com/news.php?n=412&#038;p=2&#038;t=140</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frank -- Decoding SwiftHack</title>
		<link>http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/climate-denial-crock-of-the-week/#comment-11982</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[frank -- Decoding SwiftHack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 10:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/?page_id=3083#comment-11982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When it comes to surface temperatures, nothing beats &lt;a href=&quot;http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2011/05/anthony_watts_contradicted_by.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Anthony Watts et al.&#039;s own paper&lt;/a&gt;.

-- &lt;a href=&quot;http://climategate.tk/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;frank&lt;/a&gt;
----


&lt;blockquote&gt;Curiouser and curiouser, AW and the Deniers are a constant source of wonder.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to surface temperatures, nothing beats <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2011/05/anthony_watts_contradicted_by.php" rel="nofollow">Anthony Watts et al.&#8217;s own paper</a>.</p>
<p>&#8211; <a href="http://climategate.tk/" rel="nofollow">frank</a><br />
&#8212;-</p>
<blockquote><p>Curiouser and curiouser, AW and the Deniers are a constant source of wonder.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin KLINE</title>
		<link>http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/climate-denial-crock-of-the-week/#comment-11981</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Colin KLINE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 09:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/?page_id=3083#comment-11981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone up-to-date with this horror news report?

http://biggovernment.com/jdunetz/2011/05/13/nasa-gets-caught-faking-climate-change-data-again/

Debunks, better information, and critique would be welcome !

Chiz,
&#039;im.

----

&lt;blockquote&gt;
Well:

i) &quot;Biggovernment&quot; blog is not a &quot;news report&quot;, although I suppose Forbes could be argued as one (at a stretch);
ii) It&#039;s referring to this data adjustment
http://sealevel.colorado.edu/content/global-mean-sea-level-time-series-seasonal-signals-removed. I don&#039;t know that it requires any debunking beyond the explanation provided by the research group;
3) CP just posted on sea level http://climateprogress.org/2011/05/13/greenland-sea-level-rise/&lt;/blockquote&gt;


]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone up-to-date with this horror news report?</p>
<p><a href="http://biggovernment.com/jdunetz/2011/05/13/nasa-gets-caught-faking-climate-change-data-again/" rel="nofollow">http://biggovernment.com/jdunetz/2011/05/13/nasa-gets-caught-faking-climate-change-data-again/</a></p>
<p>Debunks, better information, and critique would be welcome !</p>
<p>Chiz,<br />
&#8216;im.</p>
<p>&#8212;-</p>
<blockquote><p>
Well:</p>
<p>i) &#8220;Biggovernment&#8221; blog is not a &#8220;news report&#8221;, although I suppose Forbes could be argued as one (at a stretch);<br />
ii) It&#8217;s referring to this data adjustment<br />
<a href="http://sealevel.colorado.edu/content/global-mean-sea-level-time-series-seasonal-signals-removed" rel="nofollow">http://sealevel.colorado.edu/content/global-mean-sea-level-time-series-seasonal-signals-removed</a>. I don&#8217;t know that it requires any debunking beyond the explanation provided by the research group;<br />
3) CP just posted on sea level <a href="http://climateprogress.org/2011/05/13/greenland-sea-level-rise/" rel="nofollow">http://climateprogress.org/2011/05/13/greenland-sea-level-rise/</a></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris S.</title>
		<link>http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/climate-denial-crock-of-the-week/#comment-11393</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris S.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 10:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/?page_id=3083#comment-11393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.skepticalscience.com/co2-lags-temperature.htm

No.11 at the moment - just outside the top 10 most used septics arguments.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.skepticalscience.com/co2-lags-temperature.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.skepticalscience.com/co2-lags-temperature.htm</a></p>
<p>No.11 at the moment &#8211; just outside the top 10 most used septics arguments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kokuaguy</title>
		<link>http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/climate-denial-crock-of-the-week/#comment-11392</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kokuaguy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 08:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/?page_id=3083#comment-11392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d really appreciate your help in responding to a student who is accusing me of using my position as an instructor to
brainwash students. It&#039;s hell week and I don&#039;t have time to find the rebuttal to this. 
Mahalo from Hawaii.



&quot;That last bit regarding &quot;lazy thinking&quot; reminds me of something else you chose to spout off in class.  During our previous academic week, you said that &quot;the facts are in regarding global warming,&quot; echoing the sentiments of Al Gore and company when they simply announce that the &quot;debate is over.&quot;  THE major crux upon which your beloved man-made global warming theory lies is that an increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide causes an increase in global temperatures.  Since you cited &quot;An Inconvenient Truth,&quot; I know you are referring to Al Gore&#039;s rather convincing presentation of graphs derived from ice core samples.  The graphs correctly show a correlation between rises in CO2 and rises in global temperature.  However, Gore has that relationship backwards.  In fact, rises in CO2 FOLLOW rises in global temperature by ~800 years!&quot;
----



&lt;blockquote&gt;No problem, see:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/2008/11/12/mind-prisons-and-prisms-co2-lag-and-global-warming/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mind prisons and prisms: CO2 lag and Global Warming&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skepticalscience.com/co2-lags-temperature.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;CO2 lags temperature - what does it mean?&lt;/a&gt;

Mind you, if he is a typical Denier he will just immediately switch to another meme without acknowledging that you were right. No prob there either, Skeptical Science covers most of them.

PS and now I see Chris has referenced it as well &lt;/blockquote&gt;



]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d really appreciate your help in responding to a student who is accusing me of using my position as an instructor to<br />
brainwash students. It&#8217;s hell week and I don&#8217;t have time to find the rebuttal to this.<br />
Mahalo from Hawaii.</p>
<p>&#8220;That last bit regarding &#8220;lazy thinking&#8221; reminds me of something else you chose to spout off in class.  During our previous academic week, you said that &#8220;the facts are in regarding global warming,&#8221; echoing the sentiments of Al Gore and company when they simply announce that the &#8220;debate is over.&#8221;  THE major crux upon which your beloved man-made global warming theory lies is that an increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide causes an increase in global temperatures.  Since you cited &#8220;An Inconvenient Truth,&#8221; I know you are referring to Al Gore&#8217;s rather convincing presentation of graphs derived from ice core samples.  The graphs correctly show a correlation between rises in CO2 and rises in global temperature.  However, Gore has that relationship backwards.  In fact, rises in CO2 FOLLOW rises in global temperature by ~800 years!&#8221;<br />
&#8212;-</p>
<blockquote><p>No problem, see:<br />
<a href="http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/2008/11/12/mind-prisons-and-prisms-co2-lag-and-global-warming/" rel="nofollow">Mind prisons and prisms: CO2 lag and Global Warming</a><br />
<a href="http://www.skepticalscience.com/co2-lags-temperature.htm" rel="nofollow">CO2 lags temperature &#8211; what does it mean?</a></p>
<p>Mind you, if he is a typical Denier he will just immediately switch to another meme without acknowledging that you were right. No prob there either, Skeptical Science covers most of them.</p>
<p>PS and now I see Chris has referenced it as well </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Climate Change: How Can I Be Sure? &#124; NEWS JUNKIE POST</title>
		<link>http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/climate-denial-crock-of-the-week/#comment-10196</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Climate Change: How Can I Be Sure? &#124; NEWS JUNKIE POST]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 06:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/?page_id=3083#comment-10196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Climate Denial Crock of the Week [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Climate Denial Crock of the Week [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/climate-denial-crock-of-the-week/#comment-8919</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 20:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/?page_id=3083#comment-8919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very interesting indeed, but why not go after the doomsayers as well? They need to be exposed and outed as much as the outright deniers do.

There is definitely a middle ground, but nobody seems to want to touch it, even though it&#039;s almost certainly the REAL truth. Why? Nobody knows....................
----


&lt;blockquote&gt;No, the belief that &quot;the truth&quot; lies in the middle is a logical fallacy. See &lt;a href=&quot;http://newsjunkiepost.com/2010/03/15/environmental-politics-and-the-false-muddle/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Environmental Politics and The False Muddle&lt;/a&gt;

Science is not about compromise, it is about facts. &quot;The Truth&quot; is what the empirical evidence says it is.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting indeed, but why not go after the doomsayers as well? They need to be exposed and outed as much as the outright deniers do.</p>
<p>There is definitely a middle ground, but nobody seems to want to touch it, even though it&#8217;s almost certainly the REAL truth. Why? Nobody knows&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..<br />
&#8212;-</p>
<blockquote><p>No, the belief that &#8220;the truth&#8221; lies in the middle is a logical fallacy. See <a href="http://newsjunkiepost.com/2010/03/15/environmental-politics-and-the-false-muddle/" rel="nofollow">Environmental Politics and The False Muddle</a></p>
<p>Science is not about compromise, it is about facts. &#8220;The Truth&#8221; is what the empirical evidence says it is.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damien</title>
		<link>http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/climate-denial-crock-of-the-week/#comment-8904</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Damien]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/?page_id=3083#comment-8904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, I have been wading through most of what you have presented for the last 2 years. I started off as a believer in anthropogenic warming and then I flipped to the other side. Now I am back again. What you have compiled here is no small task, I know. I just wanted to thank you for all your hard work. I am in school currently and studying biology and eventually medicine. I have been around enough of the scientific community to know when something is being carried out in a manor becoming of the ethos of science. And you work is hands down some the best I have seen. 
Thanks alot

----
&lt;blockquote&gt;Thanks (though the credit goes to Mike). Good luck with the studies.

S2&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I have been wading through most of what you have presented for the last 2 years. I started off as a believer in anthropogenic warming and then I flipped to the other side. Now I am back again. What you have compiled here is no small task, I know. I just wanted to thank you for all your hard work. I am in school currently and studying biology and eventually medicine. I have been around enough of the scientific community to know when something is being carried out in a manor becoming of the ethos of science. And you work is hands down some the best I have seen.<br />
Thanks alot</p>
<p>&#8212;-</p>
<blockquote><p>Thanks (though the credit goes to Mike). Good luck with the studies.</p>
<p>S2</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PT</title>
		<link>http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/climate-denial-crock-of-the-week/#comment-8630</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PT]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 11:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/?page_id=3083#comment-8630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have debunked two of these videos already,

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.populartechnology.net/2010/07/rebuttal-to-flogging-scientists.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Rebuttal to &quot;Flogging the Scientists&quot;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.populartechnology.net/2010/05/rebuttal-to-video-crock-of-week-32000.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Rebuttal to &quot;Crock of the Week - 32000 Scientists&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
----


&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;strong&gt;**RotFL**&lt;/strong&gt;
rebut  (rɪˈbʌt) 
 
— vb  , -buts , -butting , -butted
	( tr ) to refute or disprove, esp by offering a contrary contention or argument 

You should be aware that rebutting something requires that you refer to what the original argument actually said, and then refuting it with a rational, logical argument that is based on facts.

Simply making irrelevant vacuous claims coupled with various logic errors such as ad hominems and appeals to authority are not a rebuttal, they are a vindication of the claim that Deniers are utterly clueless and hence believe the most idiotic frauds like the Oregon Petition.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have debunked two of these videos already,</p>
<p><a href="http://www.populartechnology.net/2010/07/rebuttal-to-flogging-scientists.html" rel="nofollow">Rebuttal to &#8220;Flogging the Scientists&#8221;</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.populartechnology.net/2010/05/rebuttal-to-video-crock-of-week-32000.html" rel="nofollow">Rebuttal to &#8220;Crock of the Week &#8211; 32000 Scientists&#8221;</a><br />
&#8212;-</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>**RotFL**</strong><br />
rebut  (rɪˈbʌt) </p>
<p>— vb  , -buts , -butting , -butted<br />
	( tr ) to refute or disprove, esp by offering a contrary contention or argument </p>
<p>You should be aware that rebutting something requires that you refer to what the original argument actually said, and then refuting it with a rational, logical argument that is based on facts.</p>
<p>Simply making irrelevant vacuous claims coupled with various logic errors such as ad hominems and appeals to authority are not a rebuttal, they are a vindication of the claim that Deniers are utterly clueless and hence believe the most idiotic frauds like the Oregon Petition.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Thibodeau</title>
		<link>http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/climate-denial-crock-of-the-week/#comment-8629</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Thibodeau]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 17:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/?page_id=3083#comment-8629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have some deniers in my own extended family. They don&#039;t keep up on these issues. So I directed them to your site to learn. Your collaboration of research is invaluable and you present it well.

----
&lt;blockquote&gt;Thanks.
S2&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have some deniers in my own extended family. They don&#8217;t keep up on these issues. So I directed them to your site to learn. Your collaboration of research is invaluable and you present it well.</p>
<p>&#8212;-</p>
<blockquote><p>Thanks.<br />
S2</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gillard: we need community consensus on climate change &#124; Young Australian Skeptics</title>
		<link>http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/climate-denial-crock-of-the-week/#comment-8441</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gillard: we need community consensus on climate change &#124; Young Australian Skeptics]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 02:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/?page_id=3083#comment-8441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] do check out the fantastic YouTube series ‘Climate Crock of the Week’ produced by Peter Sinclair — on par with the equally brilliant ‘Why People Laugh at [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] do check out the fantastic YouTube series ‘Climate Crock of the Week’ produced by Peter Sinclair — on par with the equally brilliant ‘Why People Laugh at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ozogg</title>
		<link>http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/climate-denial-crock-of-the-week/#comment-8094</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ozogg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 04:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/?page_id=3083#comment-8094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can anyone point to effective debunks of this below AGW site ?
[&amp; more recent than Peter SINCLAIR&#039;s excellent UTUBE on &#039;cooling&#039;]



http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2010/04/hoaxer-michael.html

MOONBATTERY = M4GW
April 30, 2010 &#039;Hoaxer Michael Mann: I&#039;ll Sue!&#039;
April 30, 2010 8:51 AM Posted by Van Helsing

Michael Mann, the appallingly corrupt pseudoscientist who invented Al Gore&#039;s infamously mendacious hockey stick graph, unsurprisingly emerged unscathed from a Penn State investigation into the lies he peddles on behalf of the global warming hoax. After all, Mann is a pro at sucking government money (i.e., OUR MONEY) into the university to finance phony research proving that only still more greedy and repressive government can save the allegedly imperiled planet. Now Mann has taken the offensive, threatening to sue people for laughing at him:

The parody video, titled &quot;Hide the Decline,&quot; had more than 500,000 viewers on YouTube and received national attention when Rush Limbaugh played it on his radio show. It features a cat with a guitar, a talking tree, and a dancing figure sporting the image of Professor Mann. It&#039;s the use of his image that Mann is complaining about, arguing that the video supports &quot;efforts to sell various products and merchandise.&quot;

Unfortunately for Mann and his fellow hoaxers, the lawsuit threat is blowing up in their faces now that the bluff has been called:

&quot;The guy is crazy to threaten legal action,&quot; said Jeff Davis, the President of No Cap and Trade, a large organization that includes the group Mann is threatening to sue, Minnesotans for Global Warming. &quot;A lawsuit would give us full discovery — and there&#039;s a lot to look at in his work.&quot;

At first it looked like the typical liberal intimidation tactic of screaming &quot;I&#039;ll sue&quot; would silence the opposition…

When the letter first arrived, [Minnesotans for Global Warming] quickly pulled the video from You Tube and their website because they couldn&#039;t afford to defend against a lawsuit. But, as word spread of the legal threat to the jokesters, a number of groups, including No Cap and Trade, rallied to their defense. They even backed a newer version of the video titled &quot;Hide the Decline II&quot; and re-posted on You Tube and the No Cap and Trade site.

Let&#039;s watch the videos and have good laugh at Professor Mann and his unraveling lies, shall we?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can anyone point to effective debunks of this below AGW site ?<br />
[&amp; more recent than Peter SINCLAIR's excellent UTUBE on 'cooling']</p>
<p><a href="http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2010/04/hoaxer-michael.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2010/04/hoaxer-michael.html</a></p>
<p>MOONBATTERY = M4GW<br />
April 30, 2010 &#8216;Hoaxer Michael Mann: I&#8217;ll Sue!&#8217;<br />
April 30, 2010 8:51 AM Posted by Van Helsing</p>
<p>Michael Mann, the appallingly corrupt pseudoscientist who invented Al Gore&#8217;s infamously mendacious hockey stick graph, unsurprisingly emerged unscathed from a Penn State investigation into the lies he peddles on behalf of the global warming hoax. After all, Mann is a pro at sucking government money (i.e., OUR MONEY) into the university to finance phony research proving that only still more greedy and repressive government can save the allegedly imperiled planet. Now Mann has taken the offensive, threatening to sue people for laughing at him:</p>
<p>The parody video, titled &#8220;Hide the Decline,&#8221; had more than 500,000 viewers on YouTube and received national attention when Rush Limbaugh played it on his radio show. It features a cat with a guitar, a talking tree, and a dancing figure sporting the image of Professor Mann. It&#8217;s the use of his image that Mann is complaining about, arguing that the video supports &#8220;efforts to sell various products and merchandise.&#8221;</p>
<p>Unfortunately for Mann and his fellow hoaxers, the lawsuit threat is blowing up in their faces now that the bluff has been called:</p>
<p>&#8220;The guy is crazy to threaten legal action,&#8221; said Jeff Davis, the President of No Cap and Trade, a large organization that includes the group Mann is threatening to sue, Minnesotans for Global Warming. &#8220;A lawsuit would give us full discovery — and there&#8217;s a lot to look at in his work.&#8221;</p>
<p>At first it looked like the typical liberal intimidation tactic of screaming &#8220;I&#8217;ll sue&#8221; would silence the opposition…</p>
<p>When the letter first arrived, [Minnesotans for Global Warming] quickly pulled the video from You Tube and their website because they couldn&#8217;t afford to defend against a lawsuit. But, as word spread of the legal threat to the jokesters, a number of groups, including No Cap and Trade, rallied to their defense. They even backed a newer version of the video titled &#8220;Hide the Decline II&#8221; and re-posted on You Tube and the No Cap and Trade site.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s watch the videos and have good laugh at Professor Mann and his unraveling lies, shall we?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: commemoration of disbelief &#124; Oldebeast&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/climate-denial-crock-of-the-week/#comment-8088</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[commemoration of disbelief &#124; Oldebeast&#039;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 03:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/?page_id=3083#comment-8088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] But it is more than that too. This commemoration can be seen in the denial of climate change (and here), of evolution, and in the political arena, the myths about President Obama (and here), health care [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But it is more than that too. This commemoration can be seen in the denial of climate change (and here), of evolution, and in the political arena, the myths about President Obama (and here), health care [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Countries Warming up to the Copenhagen Accord &#171; FUTURISM NOW</title>
		<link>http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/climate-denial-crock-of-the-week/#comment-8015</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Countries Warming up to the Copenhagen Accord &#171; FUTURISM NOW]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 12:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/?page_id=3083#comment-8015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Smacking the Hack Attack [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Smacking the Hack Attack [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara Lowrey</title>
		<link>http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/climate-denial-crock-of-the-week/#comment-8014</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barbara Lowrey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 19:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/?page_id=3083#comment-8014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Volcanoes produce CO2 in the form of gases and solids, mostly solids which remain bound as gas.

The amount of CO2 gas in the atmosphere has been measured since 1957 or so. Keeling curve. The steady emissions by mankind dwarf any put out by volcanoes.

The best single space to check denier stories is Skeptical Science.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Volcanoes produce CO2 in the form of gases and solids, mostly solids which remain bound as gas.</p>
<p>The amount of CO2 gas in the atmosphere has been measured since 1957 or so. Keeling curve. The steady emissions by mankind dwarf any put out by volcanoes.</p>
<p>The best single space to check denier stories is Skeptical Science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/climate-denial-crock-of-the-week/#comment-7983</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/?page_id=3083#comment-7983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My boss has suggested that volcanic gases produce far more CO2 than mankind has over the past century. I strongly suspect that this is another climate denial myth. Can you set him straight?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My boss has suggested that volcanic gases produce far more CO2 than mankind has over the past century. I strongly suspect that this is another climate denial myth. Can you set him straight?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>