BPSDBOne of the allegations made repeatedly by climate change deniers is that they are being censored. There’s just one problem with this claim: they have yet to produce a single valid example.
Monbiot’s latest column is worth spreading far and wide for two reasons:
- to keep the Watts controversy more broadly known, and hence get more people to become aware of the entire “Climate Denial Crock of the Week” series.
- Monbiot uses this incident as a framing for shooting down yet another Denier meme, the fictional censorship of Deniers, while talking about the real suppression of climate science.
“On the other hand, there are hundreds of examples of direct attempts to censor climate scientists.”
So Tweet Stumble Digg Facebook Reddit etc asap …
Unfortunately there is a broken link which I reported
The “Union of Concerned Scientists collated 435 instances of political interference is link is 404 … here is a working link Focus on Climate Science: Atmosphere of Pressure | Union of Concerned Scientists which will hopefully be corrected soon.
During warmer periods of Earth’s past, ocean upwellings were rare and the vast majority of the ocean was considered “stratified,” meaning that a pervasive, warm surface layer prevented cool and nutrient rich deep water from reaching the surface. Earth Gauge
We give our consent every moment that we do not resist.
Denier “Challenge” aka Deathwatch Update: Day 275 … still no evidence.
Comments that are not relevant to the post that they appear under or the evolving discussion will simply be deleted, as will links to Denier spam known to be scientific gibberish
- The “Mostly” Open Thread is for general climate discussion that is not relevant to a particular post. Spam and abuse rules still apply;
- The “Challenging the Core Science” Comment Thread is for comments that purport to challenge the core science of anthropogenic climate change.